Skip to main content
AnaelleExplore a pilot
WHAT ANAELLE DOES

Bring the important
parts into view.

Suggested priorities, structured summaries and clearer follow-up responsibility for the documents your clinic already receives.

A first read you can check.

Choose a synthetic document. See the priority Anaelle suggests, its SBAR summary, who is being asked to act and any coding task, beside the original.

THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT · SYNTHETIC EXAMPLE

Cardiology consultation

Cardiology clinic · Reason for referral: intermittent palpitations

Thank you for referring this patient with intermittent palpitations.

A 14-day ambulatory monitor showed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a 4% burden. Echocardiogram was normal. CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.

I have started apixaban 5 mg twice daily and will review in 6 months with a repeat monitor.

I would be grateful if you could check a CBC and renal function in 3 months and continue the apixaban prescription.

ANAELLE’S FIRST READAI draft
Yellow · Routine GP or MRP follow-up

New AF: cardiology keeps the 6-month review.

Document type: Specialist consult letterSource: Cardiology clinic

Situation
Cardiology consultation after referral for palpitations.

Background
Monitoring showed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Cardiology started apixaban.

Assessment
A new diagnosis for the problem list, with routine requests of primary care. The specialist keeps the follow-up review.

Recommendation
Add atrial fibrillation to the problem list, book a CBC and renal function in 3 months, and continue prescribing.

Who actsPrimary care: bloods in 3 months, ongoing prescribingCardiology: 6-month review with repeat monitor

Coding taskAdd atrial fibrillation to the problem list

You review the original and decide what happens next.

A suggested order for review

Prioritize incoming items by their suggested handling, with a clear manual-review category when extraction, responsibility or safety is uncertain.

See all six priority categories

Clinical letters in SBAR

Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation bring the letter’s context and requested actions into a consistent structure.

Responsibility made visible

Identify requests of primary care, distinguish specialist-owned plans and flag unclear ownership for a clinician to resolve.

Coding tasks identified

Surface tasks that may need completing before filing, such as recording a screening result or reviewing a diagnosis for the problem list.

Optional alerts for clinic coverage

Optional after-hours text alerts for urgent items can reach whoever is on call, so they fit the clinic’s existing coverage arrangements. Alerts never contain patient information. Coverage and escalation are agreed during the pilot.

THE FULL DOCUMENT STAYS AVAILABLE

Keep the detail
behind the summary.

Laboratory values, units, reference ranges and source flags remain part of the original report. Anaelle’s suggested summary is a starting point for your review.

Follow a document through the workflow

See it with your team.

Start with a synthetic inbox and the questions that matter in your practice.

Explore a pilot