A suggested order for review
Prioritize incoming items by their suggested handling, with a clear manual-review category when extraction, responsibility or safety is uncertain.
See all six priority categoriesSuggested priorities, structured summaries and clearer follow-up responsibility for the documents your clinic already receives.
Choose a synthetic document. See the priority Anaelle suggests, its SBAR summary, who is being asked to act and any coding task, beside the original.
Thank you for referring this patient with intermittent palpitations.
A 14-day ambulatory monitor showed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a 4% burden. Echocardiogram was normal. CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.
I have started apixaban 5 mg twice daily and will review in 6 months with a repeat monitor.
I would be grateful if you could check a CBC and renal function in 3 months and continue the apixaban prescription.
Prioritize incoming items by their suggested handling, with a clear manual-review category when extraction, responsibility or safety is uncertain.
See all six priority categoriesSituation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation bring the letter’s context and requested actions into a consistent structure.
Identify requests of primary care, distinguish specialist-owned plans and flag unclear ownership for a clinician to resolve.
Surface tasks that may need completing before filing, such as recording a screening result or reviewing a diagnosis for the problem list.
Optional after-hours text alerts for urgent items can reach whoever is on call, so they fit the clinic’s existing coverage arrangements. Alerts never contain patient information. Coverage and escalation are agreed during the pilot.
Laboratory values, units, reference ranges and source flags remain part of the original report. Anaelle’s suggested summary is a starting point for your review.
Follow a document through the workflowStart with a synthetic inbox and the questions that matter in your practice.